Predict And Arrive

I was recently challenged to produce a plan for building five million homes in over the next 50 years. My initial reaction was to react like the apocryphal bloke in deepest rural Ireland who, asked by a passing motorist the way to Limerick, replied that if he were going to Limerick, he wouldn-apos-t...

Posted by Jon Reeds on 20 November 2017

Affordability And Need

One of the big arguments put forward for the huge greenfield housing developments now being imposed by central government is that they would deliver so many homes they would lower house prices, and maybe even rents. The latest addition to this canon comes from the Royal Town Planning Institute which...

Posted by Jon Reeds on 08 November 2017

A Guide To The Greed Belt

A guide to green belts to address common misunderstandings is long overdue, but an organisation set up with the specific purpose of building more houses is not the body to provide it. In fact it is pretty much the worst possible author of such a publication. So I approached the Housing and Finance I...

Posted by Jon Reeds on 29 October 2017

go back

Racing carries substantial weight at Newmarket

Added on 07 September 2016

Communities secretary Sajid Javid has turned down three major greenfield housing applications in the East of England, including a development outside Newmarket he concluded would threaten the horse racing industry.

Mr Javid overturned an inspector’s recommendation to approve Lord Derby’s proposal for 400 homes on 20ha of arable land at Hatchfield Farm north of Newmarket.

He concluded it would have been in accordance with emerging local and neighbourhood plans but gave them little weight. He gave moderate weight to the scheme’s economic and benefits, significant weight to its highway benefits and substantial weight to its housing benefits.

“However, he considers that the threat to the horse racing industry carries substantial weight against the proposal,” says the decision.

“He further considers that the risks arising from increased traffic at the Rayes Lane horse crossing carry moderate weight. He considers that the loss of countryside and best and most versatile agricultural land also carries moderate weight against the proposal.”

He accepted the Council has a five-year supply of land and there are no material considerations to contradict the development plan.

Mr Javid also dismissed two appeals against rejection of schemes for up to 1,500 greenfield homes in Uttlesford district.

He supported rejection by the District Council and inspector of a scheme by Fairfield (Elsenham) for 800 homes plus offices, light industry and a school on high-grade farmland north-west of Great Dunmow.

Local plan policies are out-of-date but the Council has a five-year supply and there would have been harm to the countryside, though this time he only gave limited weight to the loss of 40ha of high-quality farmland.

“The Secretary of State concludes, in agreement with the inspector that the adverse impacts of this proposal would significantly and demonstrably outweigh the benefits when assessed against the policies in the Framework taken as a whole and as such the proposal does not amount to sustainable development,” says the decision.

He also agreed with the Council and inspector’s rejection of plans by the same developer for 700-800 homes plus employment space and school north-east of Elsenham. Many of the same considerations applied.

The decisions may leave planning consultants scratching their heads to discern a pattern in appeal decisions by the new minister.

Mr Javid has also upheld an appeal against West Oxfordshire District Council’s refusal of plans by Gladman Developments for 260 homes on farmland north-west of Witney.

The Council could not meet the so-called “five-year supply” and its local plan is out-of-date.

go back  |  top